// compare · jira
Adroyt vs Jira.
Jira is a great issue tracker. Adroyt is the PMO operating system. They solve different problems — here's the honest matrix.
// feature matrix
Feature by feature.
| feature | Adroyt | Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | PMO operating system | Software issue tracker |
| Portfolio-level dashboard | Yes | NoAdd-on required (Portfolio for Jira) |
| AI agents (28 specialised) | Yes | NoNo native AI agents |
| Natural-language Ask queries | Yes | No |
| Financial management + EVM | Yes | NoNo native budget tracking |
| RAID log (Risk/Action/Issue/Decision) | Yes | NoIssues only — no RAID framework |
| Resource pool + utilization | Yes | NoJSM Assets — not PM resources |
| Automated stakeholder digests | Yes | No |
| Demand forecasting (3-scenario) | Yes | No |
| Cascade simulation across projects | Yes | No |
| Gate governance (phase-gate reviews) | Yes | No |
| Issue tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Agile boards (Scrum / Kanban) | NoUse Jira alongside | Yes |
| CI/CD integrations | NoNot in scope | Yes |
| Multi-tenant SaaS | Yes | Yes |
| SSO (SAML / OIDC) | Yes | YesEnterprise plan only |
// the honest take
When Jira wins.
If your team runs Scrum and lives in story points, keep Jira for the sprint board. Adroyt syncs Jira issues natively — you get the PMO operating layer on top, Jira stays the delivery tracker underneath.
Adroyt earns its keep above the issue layer: portfolio truth, EVM, cascade simulation, AI agents, board-ready reports. The stuff that takes you 14 hours every Friday in spreadsheets.
// try it
See it on your portfolio.
Private beta is open. We pair you with a real Adroyt PM during onboarding — no sales tour.